
This is an all-time beautiful dress, and if she gets nominated for an Oscar for this movie (May December, from Todd Haynes) then I hope she wears it again, because it demands to be seen. But there are some different notes from the original -- they've taken a slight ruffle off the bodice, for example, and this one appears a much more stark white. As you'll see on the next slide.

Here is the original, which I photographed in 2016 when we did an anniversary trip to NYC and it was in the Met as part of the "Manus x Machina" exhibit. (I don't remember why, exactly, but my theory on the Met exhibits sometimes is that they can find any excuse to shoehorn in a particularly pretty item and just kinda justify it on the fly.) This was the museum lighting, so maybe it looks more silvery because of that; not sure. But the top definitely has a detail there that Natalie's version is missing.

It's just so gorgeous.

I couldn't stop downloading. But also, it always really amuses me when a person is standing in front of a giant version of themselves. I'm an easy mark I guess.

This is also dreamy and delightful. Dior really did right by her.

I did NOT see a credit on this dress. I assume it's also Dior, but I also wouldn't blame them for being like, "Mmm, let's ignore that one, it's really not our best work."
