Go Fug Yourself dot com Search posts, tags and authors

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

It's like someone forgot to call Karlie Kloss about this, and she was in Barbados, so they made Taylor fill in. If her name wasn't on the cover, it would have taken a long time for me to figure that out. (Is the "Who's That Girl?" headline a nod to the fact that Vogue knows Taylor doesn't really look like herself?)

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

This is very cool, and eye-catching, and very appropriate for Vogue...

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

...and I don't know why we needed two of them? Like...just decide which shot of this look works best and move on. (This one feels a bit like Taylor decided she needed to remind us that she has legs.)

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

I strenuously object to these shoes, but I actually LOVE this dress. I wish Taylor would wear it to an event. It's perfectly sparkly, but not at all twee.

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

In case you need to pluck a fishing lure off your formal gown.

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

I also want to see more of THIS dress; in fact, this whole shot is quite good, I think, although I never really enjoy the Slump Over In Front of a Painted Wall set-up.

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

This could have been the cover of Sassy in 1992, right?

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

Did I mention that I hate those shoes? I do.

Taylor Swift, Vogue, May 2016

They would NEVER do this, but I actually wish this were the cover.

Fug the Cover: Taylor Swift on Vogue, May 2016
Is my reaction to this cover supposed to be my tilting my head all the way over to the right and muttering, "are Taylor's eyebrows usually like that?" The good news is that the inside shots are pretty good. The bad news is that the cover is, to my mind, not.

1 / 1

Open image in new tab