
It's like someone forgot to call Karlie Kloss about this, and she was in Barbados, so they made Taylor fill in. If her name wasn't on the cover, it would have taken a long time for me to figure that out. (Is the "Who's That Girl?" headline a nod to the fact that Vogue knows Taylor doesn't really look like herself?)

This is very cool, and eye-catching, and very appropriate for Vogue...

...and I don't know why we needed two of them? Like...just decide which shot of this look works best and move on. (This one feels a bit like Taylor decided she needed to remind us that she has legs.)

I strenuously object to these shoes, but I actually LOVE this dress. I wish Taylor would wear it to an event. It's perfectly sparkly, but not at all twee.

In case you need to pluck a fishing lure off your formal gown.

I also want to see more of THIS dress; in fact, this whole shot is quite good, I think, although I never really enjoy the Slump Over In Front of a Painted Wall set-up.

This could have been the cover of Sassy in 1992, right?

Did I mention that I hate those shoes? I do.

They would NEVER do this, but I actually wish this were the cover.
