I couldn't get a photo of the back of this, so you'll have to look at it on Getty, but it's worth it because the back is the worst bit. There appears to be a modesty stripe over her bum. Which draws MORE attention to her rump chasm, which seems like the wrong idea.
However, I love those shoes, and they make me wish she had a shade more orange in her lipstick.
At least she is using shoes and lipstick to tie it together, but... ugh, that thing looks really inexpensive, no? And I've said it's great when things ARE inexpensive, but not so much when they betray that. Do it the way the rest of us do: Wait until you're asked, then excitedly blurt out, "I GOT IT FOR $20 AT TARGET!!!!"
This is... better, but the long ring makes it look like she has a hair elastic over her fingers. Which she could maybe USE, because her hair looks a bit disheveled.
However, her clutch and THAT ring are covetable. In a deep way.
Sparkly skirt, funky shirt that looks like a dragonfly... Am I being wooed into submission after a string of mediocrity, or is that cute? Maybe both. I don't care. I will come down on the side of YES.
But not on the footwear. I like a little more SHOE in my shoe, you know?