That fabric is moving nicely -- it's like liquid olive -- but it takes a very brave soul indeed to even THINK about wearing these. It's loco.
Her torso is so Aries right now.
I'm getting a distinct, and possibly troubling, Rooney Mara vibe off this.

Is that one of those gag snakes that shoots out of a can?
I wouldn't mind seeing a version of this that WASN'T all see-through spots. Like, your Camilla Belles and such might wear this, but not with THAT much threat of under/sideboob.
And that front one is like a high-fashion ode to Sam the Eagle. Seeing them all in a parade like this... I mean, it's effective in the moment, but it's also insane. Did there NEED to be a hundred versions glorified nipple covers?
In fact, a prevailing theme of this show was, "Buy stock in boob tape."
What a fantastic color, but the cut is a tad... dry.

That's nifty, though.
The pantsuit version is a bit more extreme. Do we think Justin Timberlake will be trying to stick Biel in this?
I like houndstooth. This is a nude-adjacent torso that works for me, as it's less aggressive.

It is a real achievement to cut leather so that it's a) frumpy, and b) unsexy.
And leather-on-leather is... a sweatstorm waiting to happen. Have you seen Albert Brooks' anchorman scene in Broadcast News? Yeah.
I'm feeling Kate Beckinsale.
The crotch phoenix rises.
This is sleek and cool. Dunst?
I love this whole look.

Hmm. I also love this, although I'm having a few pangs over how the top part looks deflated.
This girly velvet frock could be very Fanning. Or Steinfeld. Or Seinfeld, obviously.
Stunning. Even with the crazy purple shoes. My cold heart is actually tickled by those.
Coat!
COAT!
COOOOOOAT!
Coat that would make me look even more pear-shaped, but is so pretty that I might do it anyway!
I embrace plaid wholly.
My new favorite game: polterwang or napkin-folding accident? I call it POLTERWANGKIN.

Line this sucker and I'll take it in every hue.
Sigh. This show is so RELAXING to me after the Gucci spectacle.
I mean. Yearning.

Yes, please.

Sweet God. Why does there ALWAYS have to be one like this?!?
Amendment: WHY MUST THERE ALWAYS BE TWO?