
Cybill is a strong opening salvo for this pack of covers, as is the story about how to drink and stay slim.

I guess the holidays issues are more wine-focused, as this one ALSO wants to help us understand more about it. I also really enjoy the concept of "the naive dinner." What in the world.

We're in the era where all the covers are SO tight on their faces, which for a fashion magazine is a strange choice. Allure, sure, but not Vogue.

Vogue's repeated and earnest use of "super duper" also makes me laugh.

"The jewels, the furs, the men who give them" is the most regressive thing. At least nowadays it would be "BUY THEM FOR YOURSELF."

This cover is super uninformative about what "the body is it" means to fashion. I can GUESS, but.

My skin is telling me I am almost certainly not living right, but we'll solve that problem another day. Still. For a cover that includes a lot of blah elements, Kim Alexis is still shining.

Y'all! "The new romance" includes delight! WHO KNEW.

It's a Kim trifecta. I can certainly see why you'd zero in in HER face, since it gets the job done so well. (Fragrance: The Hidden Persuader" is hilarious to me.)

This photo does not have the charm i would have expected for a cover that screams CHARM.

This photo screams "apres ski" to me. And it's lovely. Please enjoy it, because the next cover is INSANE.

You're right, Vogue. I AM delighted. I am DELIGHTED IN THE EXTREME that you picked a cover photo where the model looks completely baffled as to what is happening, and why, and when it might stop.

Just what I want: A cover that looks like this woman has been asked to climb a ladder.

NONSTOP DRESSING sounds stressful.

This is giving me a crick in my neck just from looking at it.

This model has SUCH a Gigi Hadid vibe.

There's certainly a lot more joy in this cover, and the last one, than in any of the preceding. It isn't REMOTELY wintery, though.

Also not wintery. Sheer clothes don't really scream November to me.

THERE we go. Although she looks so wary. Perhaps she is thinking, "There is nothing NEW about that racism or any racism."

Cindy's hair is a riot here. I think it's supposed to look like it's being blown by wind, but there wasn't any, so it's just sprayed and teased higher than a cathedral ceiling.

The fact that "Are you dressing your age" was written by a dude is... very telling and typical. Nadja resembles someone in this photo and I can't put my finger on who it is, other than that it isn't Nadja.

Oh, come on, Vogue. Just make it "For Whom Do Women Really Dress?" Also, this cover has managed to make Cindy Crawford look silly, which is a real achievement.

That's pretty good. And also surprising to see the cover model in a basic white ski suit.

This also works, because Linda Evangelista will pull focus no matter what you do.

I didn't recognize her -- she's so synonymous to me now with the dark pixie cut. This is a cover they really should revisit now, because it feels like Stella is just ambling along the beach in her sweats and happened to look up, which is VERY atypical for Vogue but very very typical of 2020.

Not gonna lie, I WOULD like better teeth.

There are more models on the trifold, but this is the only one I have, and it's the main cover so that's your impact. It is not impressive of any of them except maybe Lauren Hutton. Please explain to me why they had Iman pose like she has cramps.

And this is a bland assemblage of identical people. Only Angela Lindvall, standing, stands out at all. And there is something enormously dismissive about the cover line, "Another Model Bobs Her Hair." That's practically The Onion in tone.

This looks like she's about to go down a slide at a July 4 party, which is weird for November for a LOT of reasons.

There have been so many better pictures of BOTH these women.

This would be more breathtaking without all the words, because they step on the illusion that she's standing at a great height on a beam. Sadly her face doesn't pop here at all, either.

I don't know if Jennifer Connelly's allure is mysterious? She's incredibly beautiful. It's not hard to parse.

There are also better photos of Reese -- I don't know why she's sitting in a field -- but compared to the next cover, it's a ray of light.

"Warm Up" is ironic considering how chilly this is, but most importantly: That is not Cate Blanchett's face. It looks more like Christine from Selling Sunset.

This is a way less flattering cover of her than the other one. Bizarrely so.

Oh, wow, and just like 2004 and 2005, we have a Connelly-to-Witherspoon progression. I like the bob and the smirk, but it's not very Vogue. I don't know WHAT magazine this feels right for, honestly.

I don't know if the women were all together in THIS shot, but they WERE all on set with each other on this day. You'd never know it. They ALL feel dropped in from an alien universe, but particularly, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO NICOLE KIDMAN.

This is better, but she also looks kind of like Eva Mendes?!? Let's just let people look like themselves.
