It may not have been Idina's night, in general. She seemed really nervous on the red carpet, which you'd think a seasoned, Tony-winning Broadway star would not be (although the world stage is certainly a lot larger than anything in New York). I like this better in photographs than I did in motion -- on the pre-show, I saw her and lamented to Jess that she often wears things that bulk her up, and she's one of the freshly single ones, so I wanted her to come out and be like, "BAM, suck on THAT, TAYE." (Note that I have no idea what caused their divorce, except that I've heard infidelity rumors about him for YEARS AND YEARS and in fact thought they had already split up once over it, which is why I'm taking the SHOVE IT IN HIS FACE angle.)
What gets me NOW, though, is the sadness of the hair and makeup. It's not matching the dress for drama or glamour, and it's bringing down the whole look. Her necklace wins in that scenario, at least, because your eye goes there and stays.
I wish she'd sounded better, too -- a couple of her notes slid off and the last line seemed wrong, and when she finished she made a slightly disappointed grimace-y face as she reached up to remove her earpiece (maybe something was wrong with it?). But I mean, Idina Menzel on an off night is still a million times more pleasant to listen to than many things, including ME, so it's a quibble. The dress... I think, for this, she should've come out in something in a frosty silver or white, beaded or jeweled, evoking the scene from the song itself -- something really showstopping. This is a musty disappointment.
This is from the same show that yielded Taylor Swift's big-red-dress moment at the CMAs. I love it, conceptually, and love it slightly less on her -- it might require a lady with a slightly daintier chest, and WHERE IS YOUR RUBY LIP, GIRL? -- but I'm still pretty damn fond of it, and I thought her voice sounded beautiful.
But why not let Liza Minnelli and Lorna Luft sing part of this? They were THERE. I know age means one's pipes will not be what they once were, but a) that's why you can adjust keys, and b) just have them sing like two lines each. Think of how emotional THAT might have been, seeing those two on-stage under those iconic shots of their mother, singing her song -- or even singing it WITH her. As Nat King/Natalie Cole as that might have been. >
That is my OTHER question: If you're paying for all that footage, can't you shell out for half the song, or a quarter of it, by Judy herself? Cut out and let Pink fill in the rest, if you have to, and maybe that would've been nicest, but we want to HEAR JUDY GARLAND. Her magic was in her voice. The whole thing made no sense. If you're going to go there, GO THERE.
I don't know what this is, but this change made sense to me -- and it's totally cute for her. The leather jacket is perfect.
I enjoy that Adam Clayton has glittering lapels.
Here's what kept bugging me about the stage: From certain angles it looked like chalk outlines of dead bodies.
Well, this was fabulous. She should never have changed.
This was not NEARLY as flattering, nor dreamy, nor Big Honking Moment, and it didn't even look that great under the stage lights, so I don't get it. NOT EVERYONE NEEDS A HUNDRED OUTFITS.
It also was weird that she sang "Wind Beneath My Wings" AFTER the entire dead-person montage, not during it. Which would have saved time. Cut that and the uninspired montages, spend that time on clever packages for the creative awards (remember when they'd show silent clips, then full clips, for the sound categories, to show you how major their work was?), maybe some behind-the-scenes stuff about the costuming for that award, etc. Celebrate all facets of the art and not just some half-executed theme of "heroes" that was arbitrarily chosen.
WHEEEEEE. Seriously, if this did not make you happy, you are dead inside.
Meryl Streep: not dead inside.