
At last, the time has come: I am rewinding so far back into history that I do not have contemporaneous photos of the event. Get ready for engravings! Let me just say that this is the only look we have at her bouquet and it is DECIDEDLY TOO SMALL. What is your deal, Victorians?!? Also would be interested to understand why the engraver here decided that the best background for the happy couple would be a bunch of barrels.

This dress IS lovely -- you'll see it in the flesh (er, in the fabric) shortly -- but do you think other Victorians complained to each other that they hated those droopy segments everyone was draping around their ears? "They really fight with my new ear bobs, Elizabeth."

"I feel like my engraving is missing something up near the Archbishop. There's this blank space I need to fill." "Why don't you just stick a BUNCH of giant throw pillows in there?" "Alastair, you're a genius!!"

These pillows make several appearances, so they must have actually been part of Her Majesty's Bridal Decor. I'm sure they were useful if someone swooned!

At some point later, the previous piece of art was turned into this bit of royal swag with the wedding portrait on top, and a family portrait there on the bottom. This has a lot happening, and I hope some of the portraits of folks along the edges are just pictures of total randoms that the swag-maker threw in to see if anyone noticed.

Here she is! This is from a 2002 exhibit called "A Century of Queens' Wedding Dresses, 1840 - 1947" at Kensington Palace. Informative Caption says that "the dresses are on display for the first time as part of the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations," and yes, the queen in THAT sentence is Elizabeth II, whose gown is in the background. This must have been an EXTREMELY ENJOYABLE exhibit and I wish I'd seen it.

And THIS dates from an exhibit at Kensington Palace in 2012 "to showcase a GBP12m (14.4m euros/19m USD) restoration of the historic palace. The restoration also features an exhibition of dresses worn by Diana, Princess of Wales," and I may have seen some of this, depending on what is still at Kensington Palace and/or has been rotated in there over the last six years or so. (When Heather and I were there in 2016, there WAS a big Victoria exhibit but I don't think her wedding gown was part of it. I do remember that she was quite short.)

Informative Caption is legitimately informative here, letting us know that these are "[s]hoes and stockings said to have been worn by Queen Victoria at her wedding in 1840. The shoes have silk satin uppers with ribbon stitched across the vamp and ribbons to tie around the ankle. The stockings are with royal cipher." These shoes do not look comfortable!

OKAY, these flags are very nifty, but what did it TASTE like? Glad you asked, because in looking this up, I discovered that this drawing is a total lie. Also: It was a fruitcake and it's also how they invented royal icing.
